Cake Report: Investing Magazine 2008 Picks, Part II
Posted by: Steve Carpenter on
Dec 30th, 2008 |
Filed under: Analytics and Metrics, Industry, Investing, Monthly Retail Investing Metrics, Uncategorized
Yesterday, I wrote about the performance of Forbes magazine’s two sets of “guru” stock picks for 2008 that, I assume, were supposed to help individual investors beat the market. The “Guru Picks” portfolio returned -46.46%, lagging all three major benchmarks, while the “Recession Beater” portfolio did a bit better with a -38.20% return, but still trailed the Dow Jones.
Today, we will look at the performance of the other major magazines’ “picks” to see how they stack up and then draw some conclusions on where we should look for investing help. Feel free to skip ahead if you are pressed for time and want to see the ending.
Kiplinger’s
Each year,Kiplinger’s publishes both a “Stocks To Own” as well as a “Best Stocks and Mutual Funds” list. I have no idea what the difference is between the two. 
For 2007, these picks did quite well, producing a 23.28% return compared to 10% for NASDAQ, 6.5% for the Dow and 3.5% for the S&P that year. This was driven by one great call in Sunpower, whose 250% return drove the performance. You can see the details here:
Position Symbol Return
Fairholme FAIRX 8.73
Medronic MDT 0.26
T Rowe Price New Era PRNEX 34.13
Dodge and Cox International DODFX 1.79
Vanguard Mid Cap Index VIMSX 5.72
Homestead Value HOVLX (8.93)
Sunpower SPWR 250.79
GE GE (1.14)
RYDEX S&P EQUAL WEIGHT RSP (4.67)
3M MMM 4.35
AIG AIG (22.84)
Annaly Capital Management NLY 29.10
Arch Coal ACI 39.40
ATT T 18.44
Cisco CSCO 5.72
Johnson & Johnson JNJ 2.70
Textron TXT 32.24
2007 Return 23.28
For 2008, Kiplinger’s did incredbile because of one incredibly prescient call- shorting bonds- which netted a whopping 3,000%+ return. Controlling for that call, the portfolio would have returned -31%, which still did beat both the market and Forbes. Here you can see for yourself:
Position Symbol Return
CGM Focus CGMFX (49.80)
Grizzly Short GRZZX 74.19
Amana Growth AMAGX (31.22)
Procter & Gamble PG (18.66)
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation PRWCX (32.38)
Fairholme FAIRX (34.47)
ATT T (34.05)
Cemex CX (65.15)
Consol Energy CNX (62.16)
Intel INTC (47.60)
Parexel PRXL (65.22)
Stanley Works SWK (34.26)
Teva Pharma TEVA (10.37)
XTO Energy XTO (32.89)
ProShares UltraShort Lehman 7-10 Year Treasury (PST) PST 3,271.71
Average 188.51
Average Without PST (31.72)
BusinessWeek
BusinessWeek has its “Where To Invest” tradition, which was published religiously…until this year. There must be no where to invest this year because it changed its title this year to “Investment Outlook“. In 2007, the picks (40 of them!), eeked out an 11% return beating all benchmarks. Similar to Kiplinger’s calls, the market beating performance was driven by 2 stocks- Apple and Hess.
Position Symbol Return
Abercombie & Fitch ANF 16.48
Alexandria Real Estate ARE 5.27
Apple AAPL 95.22
Bank of New York BK 20.83
Cephalon CEPH 4.15
Charles Schwab SCHW 29.71
Davita DVA 5.25
Hess HES 97.44
KB Home KBH (65.27)
Oracle ORCL 23.40
Southwestern Energy SWN 39.22
Target TGT (12.45)
Banco Itau ITU 35.49
Companhia Bebidas das Americas (AmBev) ABV 45.88
Gol Linhas Aereas GOL (26.02)
Telesp TSP (6.05)
Altria group MO 22.46
Groupe Danone DA 8.73
L’Oreal OR 27.42
Procter & Gamble PG 12.87
Ericsson ERIC (42.80)
H&M HMB.ST
National Bank of Greece NBG 50.98
Porsche POR.3F
Vodafone VOD 33.37
Comcast CMCSA (39.72)
Juniper Networks JNPR 40.44
NDS Group NNDS 7.73
NETGEAR NTGR 13.07
News Corp. NWS-A (6.84)
Color Kinetics CLRK
Energy Conversion Devices ENER (14.77)
Fuel Tech FTEK (18.84)
Quantum Fuel Systems Technologies Worldwide QTWW (64.42)
Zoltek ZOLT 117.95
Canon CAJ (18.68)
DENSO DNZOY 4.87
Nidec NJ (4.97)
Toray Industries 3402 TRYIF
Toyota TM (22.22)
2007 Return 11.53
This year, BW could find only 16 stocks to recommend, producing a -35% return which barely beat the indices. McDonald’s was it’s only selection that was in the black.
Position Symbol Return
Diageo DEO (35.10)
GE GE (56.92)
Waste Management WMI (5.23)
Stericycle SRCL (13.87)
Iron Mountain IRM (46.06)
VCA Antech WOOF (59.12)
Coca Cola KO (27.36)
Royal Caribbean RCL (70.33)
Smithfield Foods SFD (55.12)
Power Integrations POWI (42.99)
O’Reilly Automotive ORLY (9.13)
Stryker SYK (46.71)
Sempra Energy SRE (35.02)
McDonald’s MCD 3.65
Raytheon RTN (18.76)
Dentsply International XRAY (39.83)
2008 Return (34.87)
Smart Money
SmartMoney has its own “Where To Invest” tradition. In 2008 it could only come up with 3 stocks to recommend. Their thesis was to invest in non-American companies and financials that were unduly beaten down, which was a smart play. Unfortunately, they picked the wrong stocks and saw a -76% drop. Not so smart.
Position Symbol Return
Bunge BG (57.07)
Central European Media Enterprises CETV (83.05)
Genworth Financial GNW (89.43)
2008 Return (76.52)
Fortune
Fortune was excited to tout 10 companies as its “Best Stocks for 2008.” While it did produce a great pick in Genentech with its 20%+ gain, the portfolio would have netted you a market losing -45% return. Merrill Lynch, which was forced into a shotgun marriage with Bank of America by the government, seems to be a particularly egregious selection here.
Position Symbol Return
Electronic Arts ERTS (74.27)
St. Joe JOE (32.77)
Dick’s Sporting Goods DKS (54.97)
Genentech DNA 21.57
Merrill Lynch MER (79.32)
Berkshire Hathaway BRK.B (35.75)
Annaly Capital Mgmt NLY (16.61)
Petrobras PBR (61.07)
Jacobs Engineering JEC (53.65)
GE GE (58.00)
Fortune 2008 Return (44.48)
Summary and Conclusion
Here is how the magazines’ annual picks for 2008 compared to one another and to the markets.
Magazine Return
Kiplinger’s 188.51
Kiplinger’s Without Shorting Bonds (31.72)
BusinessWeek (34.87)
Dow Jones (35.80)
Forbes Recession Beaters (38.20)
S&P (40.60)
NASDAQ (42.30)
Fortune (44.48)
Forbes Gurus (46.46)
Smart Money (76.52)
The Cake findings for 2008 are consistent with the previous academic research done on the subject over a 20 year period. I think this is further proof that the editor’s of these major financial publications know no more than you and I about what the coming year will hold.









Comments (1) 